Why isn't online
gambling regulated in the United States?
Well,
the title is a bit misleading, online gambling on horse racing
is indeed legalized in the USA, but all other forms, including
poker and casino games have no clear legal status (except in
Washington State, where online gambling is felony). But why? Why
the legal status of online gambling in the United States remains
a gray area? No one actually knows the real reason, although
financial interests (in the form of lobby-money) could be the
reason. In order to un-boggle the minds of those who ask this
question, we will look at the major points against online
gambling made by the opposition.
Let's begin with gambling addiction.
Many who oppose legal online gambling claim that it would
increase gambling addiction among adults, since people can
gamble away their livelihood from the comfort of their toilet
seats. Extremely weak argument, considering that the current
state of online gambling is likely to cause more harm than
legalizing this form of entertainment. The
latest study conducted by the
University of Western Ontario in Canada and the University of
Nevada at Las Vegas shows that people who gamble online at the
current state of Internet gambling are more likely to develop
gambling addiction. According to the study, which urges
governments to legalize online gambling, if the industry is
legalized and regulated, it would be much easier to contain
those negative effects. Example: Alcoholism is an alcohol
addiction, but there were no AA meetings during the Prohibition.
It's also very important to add that
many online casinos and gambling websites have already taken the
step of curbing gambling addiction, even though it's more
accidental than intentional. Almost all reputable gambling
websites strictly enforce a "deposit limit", a limit on the
money you can deposit in a certain period, usually daily or
weekly. Admittedly this was done to shield the online gambling
companies from big credit card charge-backs and disputes, but it
goes a long way to protect customers from gambling their money
away on a single spin of the roulette wheel, something some
land-based casinos would allow you to do. Do you remember Ashley
Revell? Ashley Revell was the British, who went to a land-based
casino and bet his entire lifesavings on a single spin of the
roulette, back in 2006. The buzz about the bet was enormous, the
bet was even videotaped and later ran the news all over the
world. The casino where the bet took place - The Plaza
Hotel-Casino in Las Vegas! Something like this would have never
happened at an online casino.
Money laundering - some opponents of
legal online gambling are afraid that online casinos and sports
betting websites could be used to launder money for terrorist or
other criminal organizations. Could it happen? Sure. But let me
ask you this - wouldn't money laundering be less likely to occur
if the online gambling websites were actually licensed,
regulated and monitored? Even if you completely ban online
gambling throughout the United States this doesn't mean it would
go away - sports betting is illegal anywhere else but Vegas, yet
local bookies continue to thrive throughout the country, despite
the laws and the severe penalties. Making an act illegal
certainly doesn't guarantee its disappearance, on the contrary,
it's just pushed underground "out of sight - out of mind". The
current state (or a future country-wide ban) of online gambling
not only does nothing to prevent money laundering, but also
costs millions to the IRS in taxes lost.
And we left the biggest argument for the
end - children. Every opponent of legalizing online gambling
uses the children-argument at least once, while making a point
against gambling online. There are many ways a parent could
prevent their children from gambling online, you can
read the basics here. But to
prove a point, let's compare online gambling to Internet
pornography. No, they don't have anything in common, other than
the fact the both forms of entertainment are targeting the
adults. It's because of the differences we have made this
comparison.
Right off the bat, here is a rude
awakening to all - did you know that in the United States
simulated or "virtual" child pornography is legal? Yes, in 2002
the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 6-year-old law that
prohibits the distribution and possession of virtual child
pornography that appears to, but does not, depict real children.
Also, did you know that the only law against children accessing
pornographic websites required that public libraries, as a
condition of receiving federal subsidies for Internet
connectivity, employ filtering software to prevent patrons from
using Internet terminals to view images of obscenity and child
pornography, and to prevent children from viewing images
"harmful to minors"? And what prevents a minor from purchasing
cigars online? A checkbox certifying you are of legal age at the
bottom of an order form?
But what prevents minors from gambling
on the Internet? I'm glad you asked. In an unregulated online
casino today you need to provide the following information
before you can play for real money - name, address, social
security (often optional), telephone number, credit card
information. If this is your fist time depositing at this online
gambling website, often you will be required to phone in and
confirm your information and that you have requested the
deposit. When you want to withdraw your winnings for the first
time you will have to fax in a copy of your credit card used for
the deposit (front and back) along with front and back copies of
your driving license. Everything must match! Most likely you
will receive your winnings in the form of a check with the name
and address which match those on the casino account. Could you
please point me to any other place on the internet with such
scrutiny when it comes to verification? You could probably get
your credit report using less information than gambling online.
So why are YOU against legal online gambling?!?
Published on
07/18/2008
Related News:
E-mail:
news@ogpaper.com